Remarks on the preceding Paper

Remarks on the Preceding Paper Of

It is obvious that lp (/> 2:1) or any Hubert space satisfies (A). In §3 it is shown that Lp (p>l) does likewise. The method of proof is entirely different from that of Clarkson. In §4 it is shown that if X is any Banach space having the property that every function on a linear interval to X, which satisfies a Lipschitz condition, is differentiable almost everywhere, then also every function of ...

Remarks on the Preceding Case

Remarks on the paper “ Dopamine

Dear Editor, The role of neurotransmitters other than serotonin in phobicavoidance disorders has been clarified as neural science progresses. Among those, dopamine, both directly and by its interactions with other systems, is an excellent candidate for investigation. In agreement with the author’s hypothesis are also some important clinical correlates of the development of phobias and lack of m...

Remarks on the Paper ``Coupled Fixed Point Theorems for Single-Valued Operators in b-Metric Spaces''

In this paper, we improve some recent coupled fixed point resultsfor single-valued operators in the framework of ordered $b$-metricspaces established by Bota et al. [M-F. Bota, A. Petrusel, G.Petrusel and B. Samet, Coupled fixed point theorems forsingle-valued operators in b-metric spaces, Fixed Point TheoryAppl. (2015) 2015:231]. Also, we prove that Perov-type fix...

SOME REMARKS ON A PAPER OF McCARTHY

As usual we denote the number of integers not exceeding n and relatively prime to n by Euler's 0 function 0(n). Lehmer 2) calls the A (n) integers 1=a,< a 2 <. .. k. Lehmer) says that the totatives are uniformly distributed with respect to k. To shorten the notation we say that T(n, k)...